- Court stops CJ from receiving, acting on letter
•Fubara plotted for our constituencies to recall us rather than seek peace —Lawmakers
By Davies Iheamnachor & Daniel Abia
The political crisis in Rivers State took a dramatic turn yesterday as a Rivers State High Court sitting in Port Harcourt issued an interim order restraining the Chief Judge of the state, Justice Simeon Chibuzor Amadi, from receiving or acting on any directive from the Rivers State House of Assembly regarding moves to impeach Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his deputy, Prof. Ngozi Nma Odu.
The State House of Assembly had earlier in the day when it resumed its plenary unanimously resolved to go ahead with the impeachment process by sending a letter to the Chief Judge to constitute a 7-man panel to investigate allegations of gross misconduct levelled against Governor Siminialayi Fubara and his deputy, Prof Ngozi Nma Odu. All the 25 lawmakers present at the proceedings voted by show of hands in favour continuing with the impeachment process including the four members who had earlier opted to seek political solution to the crisis instead of impeachment.
The house in the letter signed by its Speaker, Hon. Martin Amaewhule, said the move was in pursuant to Section 188, subsection 5, of the Constitution of Nigeria 1999 as amended.
The letter read: “I write to request that you appoint a panel of seven (7) persons to investigate the allegations of gross misconduct against His Excellency, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, the Governor of Rivers State pursuant to section 188(5) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).
However, following two separate suits filed by Governor Fubara and Deputy Governor, Odu,, Justice F.A. Fiberesima of the High Court of Oyibo Local Government Area, in a ruling restrained the Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly, Martin Amaewhule, alongside thirty-two others including the Clerk of the House and the Chief Judge of the state from “receiving, forwarding, considering, and/or acting on any request, resolution, articles of impeachment, or other communication” aimed at constituting a panel to investigate allegations of misconduct against the governor and his deputy. The interim injunction is to last for seven days. Justice Fiberesima held that the interim measure was necessary to preserve the status quo pending further hearing.
The interim order stated that: “The Chief Judge of Rivers State is hereby restrained from receiving or acting upon any impeachment-related communication from the Assembly for the purpose of constituting an investigative panel against the Governor and his Deputy.”
The court further granted leave to the claimants to serve the interim order and originating processes on the first to thirty-one defendants at the gate of the Rivers State Assembly quarters. It also directed that the Chief Judge, listed as the 32nd defendant, be served through any staff of the judiciary at his chambers within the High Court premises.
Governor Fubara and his deputy had approached the court seeking protection against what they described as “unconstitutional attempts” by the Assembly to remove them from office. Their counsel argued that the Assembly’s actions were politically motivated and posed a threat to governance in the state. Justice Fiberesima then adjourned the matter to January 23, 2026, for hearing of the substantive motion.
Why we resolved to go ahead with impeachment process —Rivers lawmakers
Meanwhile, the state lawmakers have revealed why they insisted on impeaching the governor and his deputy. According to Hon Looloo Opuende who represents Akuku Toru constituency 11, while efforts were being made by stakeholders and some members of the Assembly to seek a political solution to the ongoing political crisis in the state, Governor Fubara was allegedly working underground to induce their constituents to recall them from the Assembly.
Speaking during a press conference at the temporary Assembly complex on Aba road, Port Harcourt on Friday, Opuende alleged that “while the impeachment process was going on, the governor was busy paying our constituents to withdraw us from the Assembly. Is that the right thing to do?
“If you wanted peace, you should have called the leadership of the Assembly and discuss with them on the right way to go. Impeachment is a constitutional matter. I support and urge the speaker to reconstitute the House for the process to continue”, he said.
The lawmaker stated that those who were issuing threat messages and saying that the impeachment should not go on should find out the root cause of the problem between the executive and the legislative arms of the state government.
When contacted for confirmation that the governor had been paying some unidentified persons to recall the lawmakers, the senior special assistant to the governor on political matters, Dr. Darlington Oji simply replied, “I am not aware”.
Orji had earlier in an interview alleged that members of the Rivers State House of Assembly received N350m each for constituency projects, despite claims by some lawmakers that certain payments to them were not appropriated.
He also noted that the N100,000 Christmas welfare last December was extended to them though some of the lawmakers rejected the offer because it was not appropriated. ”They rejected it that it was not appropriated. You cannot build something on nothing.
“Now, you rejected it because N100,000 was not appropriated. Can you ask them, the N350m naira that was given to each of them for their constituency project, where did it come from? Why did they not reject it since it was not appropriated?”
Four of the lawmakers who earlier called for the withdrawal of the impeachment proceedings and seek political solution to end the crisis have rescinded from that position.
Hon Emilia Lucky Amadi, representing Obio/Akpor constituency 11 in a press conference on Friday said “we had earlier opted for a political solution to the problem but the governor and the deputy governor are adamant. There are strong indications that they still want to continue with illegal actions in the state.
We consider this a slap to the Supreme Court and we must defend the institution of the legislature”.
Also, Hon Barile Nwakoh of Khana constituency 1 alleged that the strategy of the governor and his deputy is “to continue to intimidate us into withdrawing the process while they continue with the infractions on the constitution and the law. This is very bad to our democracy. On this note, we must proceed with the process”, she said.
Recall that on Thursday, January 8, the Assembly issued an impeachment notice on the governor and the deputy on gross misconduct bothering on extra-budgetary spending exceeding ¦ 800 billion without legislative approval, withholding statutory funds meant for the Assembly Service Commission, demolition of the Assembly complex and alleged defiance of Supreme Court rulings on legislative autonomy.
During plenary on Friday, the House under the supervision of the speaker, Martins Amaewhule subjected the matter to voting on whether the governor and his deputy should be investigated and 25 lawmakers voted in favour of the motion with none against.
The post Stalemate in Rivers: House proceeds with plans to impeach Fubara, deputy; sends letter to Chief Judge appeared first on Vanguard News.
