Two days on from the horrific terror attack targeting the Jewish community on Bondi Beach, questions have been raised about how the despicable shooting was able to occur in Australia, in the middle of one of the country's most iconic destinations.
Those queries have ranged from how the shooters escaped the watchful eye of security agencies and were able to have so many guns, to the government response to antisemitism.
Almost 48 hours after the attack, these are the answers we have to some of those questions.
LIVE UPDATES: Accused gunman awake in hospital as police investigate overseas military training trip
How did the shooters escape the attention of authorities?
Of the father-son pair that carried out the attack, one was known to authorities: 24-year-old Naveed Akram, who had been investigated by ASIO in 2019.
Both the Sydney Morning Herald and the ABC have reported he came to the attention of the security agency following the July 2019 arrest of Isaac el Matari, the self-appointed leader of Islamic State in Australia who is currently in jail for planning to carry out a terror attack on Australian soil.
However, while Naveed was investigated for six months, he was not considered by authorities to pose a threat.
"He was examined on the basis of being associated with others," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said yesterday.
READ MORE: 'Caring' woman who dedicated life to fighting discrimination named as victim of Bondi attack
"The assessment was made that there was no indication of any ongoing threat or threat of him engaging in violence."
Naveed is currently in hospital in a critical condition but is expected to be charged over the Bondi attack.
The older gunman, 50-year-old Sajid Akram, was killed during the shooting.
He had arrived in Australia in 1998 on a student visa, transferred to a partner visa three years later, and was on a resident-return visa at the time of the attack.
He was not on authorities' radar.
How did they get access to guns?
A member of a gun club, Sajid Akram held an AB licence – which covers single-shot rifles and shotguns, as well as some higher-powered firearms – and legally owned the guns used in the attack.
All six of the firearms linked to his licence have now been seized by police.
Sajid was first approved for a gun licence in 2015, but that application lapsed because he didn't get a photo taken for it.
He then applied again in 2020 – after ASIO began investigating his son over ties to IS – and the licence was eventually issued in 2023.
NSW Premier Chris Minns said this morning it is "too early" to say whether there was an intelligence failure that led to that gun licence being granted.
READ MORE: Powerful acts of heroism shaped the Bondi terror tragedy
Why wasn't there more security at the event?
While there was a police presence at the Chanukah by the Sea event targeted by the shooters, authorities have been questioned whether that was adequate, given the rise in antisemitic attacks in Sydney and across Australia since October 7, 2023.
Police were on the scene in five minutes and took down the shooters in nine.
The police response is being examined in a critical incident investigation, but Commissioner Mal Lanyon has defended the staffing levels at Bondi.
"We base our policing response on the threat that exists at the time," he said.
"A lot of work is done between ourselves and the Jewish community.
"Bondi Beach is a large and public area. We regularly patrol that area as we did on that day."
Both he and Minns have acknowledged that the presence would have been larger had there been intelligence about an attack.
"I don't think there's any doubt that if we had our time again, of course we would do things differently," the premier said.
READ MORE: Bondi attack 'inspired by Islamic State', two homemade flags found in car
"I can't take back Sunday. Nobody can," he added.
"But what we can do is ensure that, in the future, we are putting security in place so that we rebuild trust with the Jewish community."
Minns did, however, strongly defend the actions of police, saying officers acted with "bravery and integrity".
"They engaged the gunman on the footbridge with handguns," he said.
"The offenders had long-range rifles, and NSW Police officers were responsible for killing one of them and shooting the other one and, as a result, saving many, many people's lives.
"There are two officers in critical care in New South Wales hospitals. They weren't shot in the back as they were running away. They were shot in the front.
"I'm sorry to be graphic about it, but if there's any suggestion that NSW Police didn't live up to their responsibilities to the people of this state, it should be rejected because it's not consistent with the facts."
READ MORE: Plans for festive events uncertain as Sydney mourns Bondi terror attack
Why didn't the government act on antisemitic advice given to them months ago?
The federal government has been criticised for not doing enough to combat the rise in antisemitism over the last two years, including by special envoy Jillian Segal, Opposition Leader Sussan Ley and former prime minister John Howard.
"(Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's) greatest failure is not to provide the moral leadership that a prime minister can in denouncing antisemitism," Howard said, while stressing the people responsible for the attack were the two shooters.
"The impression I had was that every time he got onto the subject, he would equate it with discrimination generally."
In particular, the government has been under fire for not adopting the recommendations to combat antisemitism handed down by Segal in August.
READ MORE: After the Bondi attack, Australia's terror level remains at 'probable'. What does that mean?
"The leadership has not been there for Jewish Australians," Ley said.
The government has defended its actions.
While it hasn't yet formally adopted Segal's recommendations, Albanese pointed to several that it has acted on, including banning the Nazi salute and hate symbols, criminalising doxxing, and millions of dollars in education funding.
Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke also pointed to the deportation of people with antisemitic views as action the government has taken.
"We have acted and will continue to act on the implementation of the plan… we'll continue to work at the levels with the envoy, including a number of the recommendations for state governments to implement as well," Albanese said.
The matter has been complicated by the heavy criticism Segal's recommendations received, in part for relying on a controversial definition of antisemitism.
"The blueprint falls short in a range of areas essential to good public policy," human rights expert Louise Chappell said after their release.
"This is due to its biased arguments, weak evidence and recommendation overreach."
READ MORE: 'We forever remember your smile': Heartbreaking footage of youngest Bondi victim
Can we stop this from happening again?
Both the federal and NSW governments have promised legal reform in response to the shooting, particularly around stronger gun controls.
Investigations into the attack – at least an inquest is likely, and there are already calls for a royal commission – will provide recommendations on how to prevent future incidents.
However, it's worth noting that ASIO has been warning about the threat posed by lone wolf attacks for years.
This was Director-General Mike Burgess at the start of 2024:
"ASIO remains concerned about a lone actor moving from talk to action without warning…
"ASIO remains concerned about lone actors, though – the potential for an individual or small group under the radar of authorities to use readily available weapons to carry out an act of terrorism.
READ MORE: Bystanders shown fighting with accused Bondi gunmen in new footage
"And this is a concern across the spectrum of motivations – religious and ideological."
And this was Burgess early this year:
"The most likely perpetrator of a terrorist attack is a lone actor, from a family previously unconnected to extremism…
"All (terror matters investigated last year) were lone actors or small groups.
"Almost all the individuals were unknown to ASIO or the police and it is fair to say they allegedly moved towards violence more quickly than we have seen before."
It's also crucial to note that ASIO is effective at detecting and stopping terror attacks.
But the reality is they cannot monitor every person in the country.
"They do a marvellous job: ASIO, the AFP, their state ministry counterparts," former home affairs secretary Mike Pezzullo said yesterday, who added that "not every cell is intercepted" by authorities.
"They can't be everywhere. And frankly, if they were, we'd be a police state."
If you have been impacted by the terror attack in Bondi there is support available.
To contact Lifeline Australia, call 13 11 14 or text 0477 13 11 14.
For people under 25 years old, you can contact Kids Helpline at 1800 55 1800.
Both of these are available on a 24/7 basis.
If you wish to donate blood, you can find your nearest donor centre here.
DOWNLOAD THE 9NEWS APP: Stay across all the latest in breaking news, sport, politics and the weather via our news app and get notifications sent straight to your smartphone. Available on the Apple App Store and Google Play.