Comment on Beyond the Law: What It Means to Weaponize the Government by Charlotte Ruse

Published 10 months ago
Source: off-guardian.org

This is interesting: “Hindenburg and his advisors believed they could control Hitler and the Nazi party, ensuring a functional government and ‘preventing a communist takeover.’

Despite his reservations, Hindenburg appointed Hitler as Chancellor on January 30, 1933, marking a turning point in German history.”

The ruling elites terrified of losing wealth and power viewed the Nazi Party/fascism as a bulwark against political upheaval.

Looking back on the last decade, it’s now obvious to even liberals that if “phony Bernie” would’ve been the Dem nominee in 2016, Trump would’ve lost the election and that would’ve been the end of that.

However, avarice elites refused to make any concessions preferring to heighten economic exploitation while simultaneously plundering the treasury with a series of genocidal wars. 🤑

To put it simply, if there are only two viable right-wing political parties, and one is merely a controlled opposition to the other then what we’re witnessing is the inevitable outcome.

History repeats itself, just in a slightly different form. 🤔