In reply to Howard.
Those “ruled” have far more in common with those who “rule” than with any who seek to point out the essential evil (though I would call it insanity) of the system.
For the most part that is because they have more to lose than knowingly gain by risking a change.
That applies equally to those who are wealthy or comfortably off as to those living on benefits (welfare). Those in the first two categories may have achieved it through inheritance, marriage, theft or sheer hard work and are therefore beneficiaries of the system and feel no need to rock the boat. Those receiving all types of social security benefits are dependent on the system to pay them, so also have a vested interest to remain within it.
The Plandemic demonstrated that amply – by throwing peanuts at monkeys eg furlough, Work from Home etc. that people will consent to most anything. Also, welfare payments continued to be paid unimpeded throughout the time.
Until people have nothing to lose or as close to it, then they will continue to accept their lot in life.
That is the reason I have stated previously, that an uncontrolled financial/economic collapse of the system and not a controlled demolition would be a wake-up call for many. If welfare benefits, pensions and salaries could not be paid and the banking system declared a ‘bank holiday’ due to a systemic collapse, we would see fireworks very quickly.