Avatar: Fire and Ash has a bum-numbing length – but that’s not its biggest problem

Published 3 hours ago
Source: metro.co.uk
Oona Chaplin as Varang leans in, staring intently, in a scene from Avatar: Fire and Ash. She us wearing a red and black feathered head-dress
Avatar: Fire and Ash comes nearly three years after Avatar: The Way of Water (Picture: 20th Century Studios/Disney)

The bum-numbing Avatar: Fire and Ash proves no film needs to be 197 minutes long.

While the movie keeps things surprisingly pacey and is, of course, a visual treat for the eyes, there was no getting away from the fact I was starting to feel quite uncomfortable at the three-hour mark.

From this, you may gather that James Cameron’s Avatar threequel, coming three years after Avatar: The Way of Water, didn’t keep me enthralled all the way through – and I’m disappointed to admit that.

In 2022, The Way of Water seemed like the sequel no one wanted, coming 13 long years after the original and surely confirming that we were over Cameron’s blue nine-foot and three-fingered aliens.

But with so much more introduced of Pandora and its Na’vi, as well as the film’s new approach and storylines, I was happy to be proven wrong.

For Fire and Ash, we don’t experience that same reinvigoration or match those same narrative highs – sections of the screenplay feel a bit copy and paste here – so I’m fascinated to see how this performs at the box office, given the record-breaking combined haul of the first two: over $5.2billion (£3.88bn).

Up Next

Undated film still from Avatar: Fire And Ash. Pictured: Sam Worthington as Jake Sully. See PA Feature SHOWBIZ Film Reviews. WARNING: This picture must only be used to accompany PA Feature SHOWBIZ Film Reviews. PA Photo. Picture credit should read: 20th Century Studios. All Rights Reserved. NOTE TO EDITORS: This picture must only be used to accompany PA Feature SHOWBIZ Film Reviews.
Unfortunately the film didn’t keep me enthralled all the way through (Picture: 20th Century Studios/Disney)

We rejoin the Sully family one year on from the devastating loss of son and brother Neteyam in The Way of Water’s climactic battle against the resource-hungry humans of the RDA, who are mining Pandora for Unobtanium.

For Fire And Ash, the focus is starting to shift more onto the second generation of Sullys as Lo’ak (Britain Dalton) plays occasional narrator while he grapples with the grief and guilt over the loss of his older brother.

POLL
Poll

Will you be seeing Avatar: Fire and Ash in cinemas?

  • Yes - get me to Pandora!Check
  • No, I'm not interestedCheck
  • I'll wait till I can see it at homeCheck
This image released by 20th Century Studios shows Kiri, performed by Sigourney Weaver, in a scene from "Avatar: Fire and Ash." (20th Century Studios via AP) 15383795
James Cameron said ‘brave choices’ have ensured that the third film stands out (Picture: 20th Century Studios/Disney)

He longs to support this parents, Jake and Neytiri (Sam Worthington and Zoe Saldaña, impressively committed to their performances as ever), on the frontline in the fight to save Pandora and their adopted home with the Metkayina clan, but must also watch out for sisters Kiri and Tuk (Sigourney Weaver and Trinity Jo-Li Bliss), as well as adopted human brother Spider (Jake Champion).

However, the dangers are deadlier than ever before once a new, aggressive Na’vi tribe – the Mangkwan clan – ally with Jake’s enemy and old commander, Quaritch (Stephen Lang).

Avatar: Fire and Ash: Key details

Director

James Cameron

Writers

James Cameron, Rick Jaffa, Amanda Silver

Cast

Sam Worthington, Zoe Saldaña, Oona Chaplin, Sigourney Weaver, Stephen Lang, Kate Winslet, David Thewlis, Jack Champion, Britain Dalton, Trinity Jo-Li Bliss, Giovanni Ribisi, Edie Falco

Age rating

12A

Runtime

3hr 17m

Release date

In cinemas from Friday, December 19.

This image released by Disney shows a scene from "Avatar: Fire and Ash." (20th Century Studios/Disney via AP)
The world of Pandora is still visually stunning (Picture: 20th Century Studios/Disney)

As Mangkwan leader Varang, Oona Chaplin is the best thing about Fire and Ash, eating up the screen with her simmering rage. She upends the usually peaceful inter-relations of the Na’vi and brings a welcome boost of unpredictable energy.

It helps excuse some of the similar back and forth in plot terms to The Way of Water between the RDA and the Sullys, with both Jake and Spider – Quaritch’s biological son – targets once more, before it all builds to a huge climactic battle (again).

With this, Avatar: Fire and Ash could be the film where the wider audience starts to drop away, losing patience for both the plot’s digressions and sense of holding back – Fire and Ash feels like the bridge film to something even grander for Cameron’s hoped-for Avatar 4 and 5.

This image released by 20th Century Studios shows Neytiri, performed by Zoe Salda??a, left, and Jake Sully, performed by Sam Worthington, in a scene from "Avatar: Fire and Ash." (20th Century Studios via AP)
Zoe Saldaña and Sam Worthington continue to be impressively committed and raw as their characters via ‘performance capture’ (Picture: 20th Century Studios/Disney)
Undated film still handout from Avatar: Fire and Ash. Pictured: Oona Chaplin as Varang. See PA Feature SHOWBIZ Film Avatar. WARNING: This picture must only be used to accompany PA Feature SHOWBIZ FILM Avatar. PA Photo. Picture credit should read: Disney. All Rights Reserved. NOTE TO EDITORS: This picture must only be used to accompany PA Feature SHOWBIZ FILM Avatar.
Varang (Oona Chaplin) is the best part of Avatar: Fire and Ash (Picture: 20th Century Studios/Disney)

But that’s if we even get there, as Cameron has warned that Avatar 3 needs to ‘make a lot of money’ to get those remaining sequels greenlit. It’s a shame if we end it on this note.

It also must be emphasised that Avatar: Fire and Ash is still visually, absolutely stunning – the water, the skin texture, the Na’vi facial expressions (you can see, more and more, those tiny nuances that animate the faces of the actors in real life). And this type of tireless, ground-breaking work that goes into the film’s VFX could easily be taken for granted when nothing else is touching it in cinema.

Avatar: Fire and Ash could have withstood a pretty monster edit and still delivered all the plot points it needed to – but gargantuan runtimes have hardly interfered with Cameron’s success previously.

Verdict

The latest visit to Avatar is only a bit of a letdown in comparison to what’s come before – and how it sometimes feels like it’s repeating it. But this franchise still delivers spectacle like nothing else.

Avatar: Fire and Ash is in cinemas from today.

This article was first published on December 16, 2025.

Got a story?

If you’ve got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us [email protected], calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we’d love to hear from you.

Categories

EntertainmentFilmAvatarFilm reviewsJames CameronSam WorthingtonSigourney WeaverZoe Saldana